|
Our research focuses on the
integration of manufacturing system CAD/CAM models with
statistics-based methods for design, control and diagnostics
of multistage processes. To this end our research addresses
the following:
Recent studies show that major
challenges in design and implementation of complex
manufacturing systems are related to system failures and
quality deterioration during ramp-up phase. As high as 72% of
root causes of process variation in automotive assembly are
due to fixture failure [2].
However, relatively little was done on systematic fixture
failure diagnosis during ramp-up of a new manufacturing
system.
Traditional quality improvement methods do not provide
systematic approaches for fault root cause diagnostics. Until
recently, existing methods for quality improvement were
primarily based on statistical analysis of in-process
measurements detecting process change rather than determining
root cause. Such methods are not always effective for complex
systems such as auto body assembly and may not be applicable
for new product/process launches (ramp-up phase) due to the
unavailability of historical statistical data, pre-enumerated
faults or identified case studies. Yet, diagnostics
methodologies consider limited discrete definition of fault
(fault/no fault or 1/0), which is insufficient for quality
improvement and ramp-up of new manufacturing systems.
Our research has led to the
development of a methodology for quality improvement by root
cause diagnosis of dimensional variability in multiple station
manufacturing processes (MMP) [1,
3,
17,
20]. This requires developing statistical
methods driven by engineering models (CAD/CAM) to isolate
fault root cause. This is a
departure from classical approaches in statistic, which
utilize previously captured data or solved case studies.
Additionally, fault definition is expanded to cover cases
where fault is understood as a continuous function spanning
between 0 and 1. This integration holds a promising direction
for quality engineering research and is especially relevant
given the lack of historical data in new and short-run
manufacturing processes.
We proposed a new methodology for in-process dimensional fault
diagnostics and quality improvement of multi-station body
assembly systems by combining process variability detection,
isolation and root cause determination
[1,
3,
12,
16,
17,
20]. In this research, a new hierarchical
model of assembly architecture and sequence is developed.
This represents a multi-level body assembly system
[1,
3,
17, 52,
59,
60] based on which a set of correlation
clustering and diagnostic reasoning techniques are studied.
These techniques are based on the developed fixture failure
model (CAD/CAM) and its relationship with measurement data
represented as principal components analysis (PCA)
[3,
17, 55]. Our research proved the inherent
relationship between fixture failures and PCA
[3,
55].
This builds a foundation for fixture fault diagnosis that
further led to the knowledge-based dimensional fault diagnosis
methodology, used during the launch of new automotive body
assembly processes. The implementation of this methodology
helped to: (a) accomplish the 2-mm dimensional
variation level for automotive body, achieved for the first
time by a US auto assembly (JNAP/DaimlerChrysler); (b)
receiving the 1998 J.D. Powers award by Bramalea Plant,
DaimlerChrysler for best quality vehicle in the US market.
Additionally, it became part of the Chrysler Operating System
(COS) in 1998 for all new car and truck launches and of GM’s
“BIW Data Analyzer” software.
We feel that our work provides a theoretical basis for process
variability diagnosis for sheet metal assembly. This has
created the dual benefits of continuously improving quality
while at the same time reducing overall product development
time through rapid fault root cause detection. It also
provides a model for optimal sensor placement for single
fixture [9]
and for multistage manufacturing processes (MMP) with
end-of-line sensing [7]
or with distributed in-process sensing
[11,
23] (please also see
(2)
Sensor Networks in Manufacturing). This
further led to evaluation and optimizing of assembly design [8,
19, 38,
44,
46] and tolerancing study
[21,
28, 10,
55 ] presented in (3)
Integration of Product and Process Characteristics.
|