1993 Southeastern Conference Statistics INDIVIDUAL (NCAA Ranking in Parenthesis) Rushing G ATT YDS AVG TD YDSPG 1. James Bostic, Auburn (13) 11 199 1205 6.1 12 109.6 2. Errict Rhett, Florida (16) 12 247 1289 5.2 11 107.4 3. Charlie Garner, Tenn (17) 11 159 1161 7.3 8 105.6 4. Moe Williams, Kentucky 11 164 928 5.7 5 84.4 5. Michael Davis, Miss. St. 11 205 883 4.3 7 80.3 Passing (Minimum of 10 Passes per Game Played) CMP RATING ATT CMP PCT INT YDS YDSPG TD POINTS 1. Heath Shuler, Tennessee (6) 285 184 64.6 8 2354 214.0 25 157.3 2. Eric Zeier, Georgia (18) 425 269 63.3 7 3525 320.5 24 148.3 3. Terry Dean, Florida (20) 200 118 59.0 10 1651 165.1 17 146.4 4. Danny Wuerffel, Florida (22) 273 159 58.2 10 2230 202.7 22 146.1 5. Stan White, Auburn 271 164 60.5 8 2057 187.0 13 134.2 Receiving (By Number of Receptions) G REC YDS TD YDSPG CTPG AVG 1. Brice Hunter, Georgia 11 76 970 9 88.2 6.9 12.8 2. David Palmer, Alabama 12 61 1000 7 83.3 5.1 16.4 3. Jack Jackson, Florida 12 51 949 11 79.1 4.3 18.6 4. Shannon Mitchell, Ga. 11 49 539 2 49.0 4.5 11.0 5. Willie Jackson, Florida 9 49 675 6 75.0 5.4 13.8 Field Goals G FGA FGM PCT FGPG 1. Michael Proctor, Alabama (1) 12 29 22 .76 1.8 2. Kanon Parkman, Georgia (3t) 11 27 19 .70 1.7 3. Tom Burke, Miss. State (6t) 11 23 17 .74 1.6 4. Andre Lafleur, L.S.U. (13) 10 17 14 .82 1.4 5. Judd Davis, Florida (23t) 12 19 15 .79 1.3 Punting G NO YDS AVG 1. Terry Daniel, Auburn (2) 11 51 2393 46.9 2. Bryne Diehl, Alabama (7) 12 56 2441 43.6 3. Todd Jordan, Miss. St. (11) 11 56 2403 42.9 4. Shayne Edge, Florida 12 43 1837 42.7 5. Scott Holstein, L.S.U. 11 56 2233 39.9 6. Tom Hutton, Tennessee 11 40 1584 39.6 Punt Returns (Minimum 1 Punt Return per Game) G NO YDS AVG PGM TD 1. Shawn Summers, Tennessee (2) 11 18 255 14.2 1.6 1 2. Scott Gumina, Miss. St. (4) 9 13 180 13.9 1.4 1 3. Eddie Kennison, L.S.U. (6) 11 20 256 12.8 1.8 0 4. Ta'Boris Fisher,Ole Miss(14) 11 29 330 11.4 2.6 1 5. Sorola Palmer, Florida (22t) 10 13 169 9.9 1.3 0 Kickoff Returns G NO YDS AVG PGM TD 1. Billy Williams, Tennessee 11 13 369 28.4 1.2 0 2. Jack Jackson, Florida (5) 12 17 480 28.2 1.4 1 3. Mark Smith, Ole Miss 10 11 290 26.4 1.1 0 4. David Butler, L.S.U. 11 11 270 24.6 1.0 0 5. Tony Jackson, Vandy (23t) 11 31 753 24.3 1.3 0 Interceptions 1. Alundis Brice, Ole Miss (2t) 11 7 98 2 .6 2. Antonio Langham, Alabama(2t) 11 7 66 1 .6 3. Orlando Watters, Arkansas (7t) 11 6 185 2 .6 4. Marcus Jenkins, Kentucky (7t) 11 6 45 0 .6 5. Walt Harris, Miss. St. (7t) 11 6 59 0 .6 Scoring G TD XP FG PTS PTPG FGA XPA 1. John Becksvoort, Tenn (10) 11 0 59 12 95 8.6 13 59 2. Kanon Parkman, Georgia (12) 11 0 35 19 92 8.4 27 36 3. Michael Proctor, Alabama(17) 12 0 31 22 97 8.1 29 31 4. Judd Davis, Florida (18t) 12 0 51 15 96 8.0 19 53 5. Scott Etheridge, Auburn 11 0 45 12 81 7.4 15 45 Total Offense RUSHING PASSING TOTAL CAR GAIN LOSS NET ATT YDS PLAYS YDS 1. Eric Zeier, Georgia (3) 59 161 204 -43 425 3525 484 3482 2. Heath Shuler, Tennessee (29) 46 137 64 73 285 2353 331 2426 3. Danny Wuerffel, Florida 40 46 135 -89 273 2230 313 2141 4. Stan White, Auburn 79 208 175 33 271 2057 350 2090 5. Todd Jordan, Miss. State 42 123 136 -13 294 1935 336 1922 TEAM Total Offense GMS PLAYS YDS AVG TD YDSPG 1. Tennessee (6) 11 762 5286 6.94 62 480.55 2. Florida (7) 12 888 5719 6.44 61 476.58 3. Georgia (19) 11 776 4733 6.10 39 430.27 4. Auburn (25) 11 800 4620 5.78 45 420.00 5. Alabama 12 835 4688 5.61 36 390.67 6. Miss. State 11 767 3932 5.13 27 357.45 7. South Carolina 11 734 3638 4.96 21 330.73 8. Kentucky 11 759 3620 4.77 26 329.09 9. Arkansas 11 731 3477 4.76 22 316.09 10. L.S.U. 11 759 3451 4.55 21 313.73 11. Ole Miss 11 682 3352 4.91 28 304.73 12. Vanderbilt 11 721 2682 3.72 16 243.82 Total Defense GMS PLAYS YDS AVG TD YDSPG 1. Ole Miss (1) 11 724 2580 3.56 14 234.55 2. Alabama (5) 12 738 3104 4.21 19 258.67 3. Tennessee (13) 11 780 3395 4.35 16 308.64 4. Auburn (15) 11 698 3432 4.92 24 312.00 5. South Carolina 11 759 3664 4.83 25 333.09 6. Florida 12 836 4039 4.83 28 336.58 7. Kentucky 11 729 3796 5.21 23 345.09 8. Miss. State 11 771 3862 5.01 28 351.09 9. Vanderbilt 11 715 3876 5.42 37 352.36 10. Arkansas 11 765 3925 5.13 22 356.82 11. Georgia 11 785 4190 5.34 37 380.91 12. L.S.U. 11 734 4353 5.93 41 395.73 Rushing Offense GMS CAR YDS AVG TD YDSPG 1. Tennessee(13) 11 442 2621 5.93 27 238.27 2. Auburn (21) 11 513 2432 4.74 26 221.09 3. Kentucky (24) 11 545 2315 4.25 17 210.45 4. Vanderbilt 11 564 2136 3.79 14 194.18 5. Arkansas 11 498 2123 4.26 14 193.00 6. Alabama 12 535 2119 3.96 20 176.58 7. Miss. State 11 436 1791 4.11 12 162.82 8. Ole Miss 11 426 1574 3.69 9 143.09 9. Florida 12 400 1647 4.12 18 137.25 10. L.S.U. 11 418 1449 3.47 12 131.73 11. South Carolina 11 409 1371 3.35 11 126.64 12. Georgia 11 344 1181 3.43 12 107.36 Rushing Defense GMS CAR YDS AVG TD YDSPG 1. Ole Miss (6) 11 463 1127 2.43 8 102.45 2. Florida (9) 12 417 1334 3.20 9 111.17 3. Tennessee (12) 11 433 1290 2.98 8 117.27 4. Auburn (21) 11 349 1393 3.99 7 126.64 5. Alabama (25) 12 428 1565 3.66 10 130.42 6. Vanderbilt 11 397 1453 3.66 15 132.09 7. Miss. State 11 440 1535 3.49 10 139.55 8. Kentucky 11 385 1707 4.43 11 155.18 9. Arkansas 11 463 1853 4.00 11 168.45 10. South Carolina 11 494 2010 4.07 18 182.73 11. L.S.U. 11 434 2149 4.95 20 195.36 12. Georgia 11 488 2161 4.43 21 196.45 Passing Offense GMS ATT CMP INT PCT YDS ATT TD YDSPG INTPA YDS/CMP 1. Florida (4) 12 488 284 21 .58 4072 8.34 41 339.33 4.30 14.34 2. Georgia (8) 11 432 272 7 .63 3552 8.22 24 322.91 1.62 13.06 3. Tennessee 11 320 208 9 .65 2665 8.32 31 242.27 2.81 12.81 4. Alabama 12 300 169 16 .56 2569 8.56 13 214.08 5.33 15.20 5. S. Carolina 11 325 163 14 .50 2267 6.98 8 206.09 4.31 13.91 6. Auburn 11 288 174 8 .60 2188 7.60 15 198.91 2.78 12.57 7. Miss. State 11 331 144 10 .44 2141 6.47 14 194.64 3.02 14.87 8. L.S.U. 11 341 161 16 .47 2002 5.87 9 182.00 4.69 12.43 9. Ole Miss 11 255 143 14 .56 1778 6.97 14 161.64 5.49 12.43 10. Arkansas 11 233 114 10 .49 1354 5.81 6 123.09 4.29 11.88 11. Kentucky 11 214 108 11 .50 1305 6.10 9 118.64 5.14 12.08 12. Vanderbilt 11 157 55 13 .35 546 3.48 0 49.64 8.28 9.93 Passing Defense (NCAA Ranks Pass Efficiency Defense) GMS ATT CMP INT PCT YDS ATT TD YDSPG INTPA YDS/CMP 1. Alabama (2) 12 310 144 22 .46 1539 4.96 9 128.25 7.10 10.69 2. Ole Miss (3) 11 261 117 15 .45 1453 5.57 5 132.09 5.75 12.42 3. S. Carolina 11 265 145 3 .55 1654 6.24 7 150.36 1.13 11.41 4. Georgia 11 297 163 17 .55 2029 6.83 14 184.45 5.72 12.45 5. Auburn (9) 11 349 153 15 .44 2039 5.84 15 185.36 4.30 13.33 6. Arkansas 11 302 171 13 .57 2072 6.86 9 188.36 4.30 12.12 7. Kentucky (11) 11 344 177 20 .51 2089 6.07 11 189.91 5.81 11.80 8. Tennessee (5) 11 347 167 18 .48 2105 6.07 7 191.36 5.19 12.60 9. L.S.U. 11 300 176 13 .59 2204 7.35 20 200.36 4.33 12.52 10. Miss. State 11 331 185 15 .56 2327 7.03 14 211.55 4.53 12.58 11. Vanderbilt 11 318 174 13 .55 2423 7.62 16 220.27 4.09 13.93 12. Florida 12 419 233 16 .56 2705 6.46 17 225.42 3.82 11.61 Scoring Offense GMS PTS AVG TD KXP OXP FG SF 1. Tennessee (2) 11 471 42.82 62 59 1 12 1 2. Florida (4) 12 472 39.33 61 53 3 15 1 3. Auburn (18) 11 353 32.09 45 45 0 12 1 4. Georgia 11 328 29.82 39 35 1 19 0 5. Alabama 12 316 26.33 36 32 1 22 0 6. Ole Miss 11 242 22.00 28 25 0 15 2 7. Miss. State 11 241 21.91 27 18 5 17 0 8. Kentucky 11 207 18.82 26 22 3 7 1 9. L.S.U. 11 190 17.27 21 17 1 15 0 10. S. Carolina 11 188 17.09 21 18 0 14 1 11. Arkansas 11 165 15.00 22 18 0 5 0 12. Vanderbilt 11 137 12.45 16 15 0 8 1 Scoring Defense GMS PTS AVG TD KXP OXP FG SF 1. Ole Miss (4) 11 142 12.91 14 10 2 14 1 2. Tennessee (5) 11 144 13.09 16 13 1 11 0 3. Alabama (6) 12 158 13.17 19 16 1 8 1 4. Auburn (9) 11 192 17.45 24 20 2 8 1 5. Kentucky (21) 11 195 17.73 23 18 2 11 1 6. Arkansas (25) 11 208 18.91 22 20 1 18 0 7. S. Carolina 11 214 19.45 25 20 1 14 0 8. Florida 12 237 19.75 28 22 1 15 0 9. Miss. State 11 245 22.27 28 24 0 17 1 10. Georgia 11 289 26.27 37 33 2 10 0 11. Vanderbilt 11 290 26.36 37 36 0 10 1 12. L.S.U. 11 308 28.00 41 38 0 8 0 Kickoff Returns GMS NO YDS TD AVG 1. Tennessee (12) 11 28 661 0 23.61 2. Florida (22) 12 37 828 1 22.38 3. Vanderbilt 11 48 1005 0 20.94 4. Ole Miss 11 37 773 0 20.89 5. Georgia 11 43 861 0 20.02 6. Alabama 12 30 589 0 19.63 7. L.S.U. 11 46 901 0 19.59 8. S. Carolina 11 29 541 0 18.66 9. Auburn 11 30 537 0 17.90 10. Arkansas 11 36 640 0 17.78 11. Miss. State 11 36 633 0 17.58 12. Kentucky 11 33 577 0 17.48 Punt Returns GMS NO YDS TD AVG 1. L.S.U. (6) 11 20 256 0 12.80 2. Tennessee (9) 11 37 453 2 12.24 3. Ole Miss (13) 11 37 420 1 11.35 4. Georgia (20) 11 25 263 1 10.52 5. Miss. State (21) 11 33 335 1 10.15 6. Florida 12 35 298 0 8.50 7. Alabama 12 32 270 0 8.44 8. Auburn 11 32 264 0 8.25 9. South Carolina 11 31 218 2 7.03 10. Vanderbilt 11 16 104 0 6.50 11. Arkansas 11 28 157 0 5.61 12. Kentucky 11 30 153 0 5.10 Net Punting YDS NET TOT PUNTS AVG RET RET AVG YDS 1. Auburn (7) 51 46.92 26 418 38.73 2393 2. Florida (9) 44 41.80 20 142 38.50 1839 3. Alabama (14) 56 43.59 29 311 38.04 2441 4. Miss. State (15) 64 41.97 31 267 37.80 2686 5. Tennessee (21) 42 39.19 18 77 37.36 1646 6. L.S.U. 56 39.88 22 166 36.91 2233 7. Arkansas 56 37.66 20 110 35.70 2109 8. Kentucky 55 37.25 21 139 34.73 2049 9. Georgia 48 37.54 32 158 34.25 1802 10. S. Carolina 69 35.83 30 214 32.72 2472 11. Ole Miss 66 34.18 25 159 31.77 2256 12. Vanderbilt 70 35.54 36 268 31.71 2488 Third Down Conversions G CONV ATT PCT 1. Tennessee 11 60 129 .47 2. Arkansas 11 77 166 .46 3. Florida 12 65 156 .42 4. L.S.U. 11 69 169 .41 5. Alabama 12 75 188 .40 6. Auburn 11 57 146 .39 7. Kentucky 11 64 168 .38 8. Miss. State 11 63 175 .36 9. Georgia 11 55 151 .36 10. S. Carolina 11 54 163 .33 11. Vanderbilt 11 52 167 .31 12. Ole Miss 11 43 145 .30 The WWW site would like to thank the following for their upload: PA161418@utkvm1.utk.edu (Eddie Howell)