Schedule rankings for the 1994 season as provided by the NCAA. The NCAA based the rankings on the winning percentage of each team's 1994 opponents against other Division I-A schools last season: Future Opponents Rk. School W L T Pct. 1. Michigan 75 41 3 .643 2. Southern Cal 72 43 0 .626 3. NE Louisiana 47 28 1 .625 4. Boston College 70 42 1 .624 5. Miami, Fla. 65 40 1 .618 6. Georgia 65 40 2 .617 7. Florida State 70 44 0 .614 8. Washington St. 73 46 1 .613 9. UCLA 70 44 3 .611 10. Kentucky 64 41 3 .606 11. Pittsburgh 68 45 3 .599 12. Colorado 62 41 3 .599 13. Purdue 68 46 3 .594 14. Michigan St. 69 47 2 .593 15. Arizona St. 68 46 0 .586 16. Nebraska 71 52 3 .574 17. Northwestern 66 49 2 .572 18. Oklahoma 62 46 5 .570 19. Florida 64 49 2 .565 20. Iowa State 55 42 4 .564 21. Southern Miss. 60 47 1 .560 22. N. Carolina St. 58 46 2 .557 23. Texas Tech 60 48 4 .554 24. Washington 63 51 1 .552 25. Tennessee 64 52 3 .550 26. Maryland 63 52 1 .547 27. LSU 61 50 5 .547 28. Georgia Tech 58 48 0 .547 29. Stanford 64 53 0 .547 30. Oregon State 61 51 0 .545 31. Indiana 62 52 2 .543 32. Mississippi 55 46 4 .543 33. Temple 59 50 1 .541 34. Rutgers 60 51 1 .540 35. Oregon 64 55 0 .538 36. Auburn 50 53 4 .536 37. Ohio State 68 59 1 .535 38. Louisville 58 51 2 .532 39. California 59 53 0 .527 40. Wisconsin 60 54 1 .526 41. Virginia 53 48 0 .525 42. West Virginia 63 57 3 .524 43. Missouri 63 57 4 .524 44. Syracuse 59 54 0 .522 45. Vanderbilt 58 53 3 .522 46. Kansas State 56 53 1 .514 47. Minnesota 58 55 2 .513 48. Arizona 59 56 0 .513 49. Texas 57 54 4 .513 50. Mississippi St. 56 54 4 .509 51. SMU 58 56 2 .509 52. Notre Dame 59 57 0 .509 53. Brigham Young 59 57 0 .509 54. Arkansas 54 53 5 .504 55. Illinois 56 55 3 .504 56. Penn State 58 57 1 .504 57. Wake Forest 51 51 0 .500 58. Oklahoma State 49 49 4 .500 59. Cincinnati 48 49 5 .495 60. Clemson 51 53 0 .490 61. Kansas 49 51 4 .490 62. Alabama 47 49 4 .490 63. Colorado St. 56 59 1 .487 64. South Carolina 53 56 4 .487 65. San Diego St. 54 57 0 .486 66. Navy 48 51 2 .485 67. Texas A&M 52 56 5 .482 68. Miami, Ohio 51 55 4 .482 69. Wyoming 53 60 1 .469 70. E. Michigan 49 56 5 .468 71. San Jose St. 51 58 0 .468 72. Houston 51 60 4 .481 73. Utah State 45 53 0 .459 74. Duke 50 59 0 .459 75. TCU 50 60 4 .456 76. Ball State 49 59 2 .455 77. Fresno State 59 71 1 .454 78. UNLV 43 52 2 .454 79. Virginia Tech 49 60 3 .451 80. East Carolina 44 54 3 .450 81. New Mexico 56 59 2 .449 82. Hawaii 51 63 1 .448 83. Air Force 54 68 0 .443 84. North Carolina 49 62 2 .442 85. UT-El Paso 44 56 1 .441 86. Iowa 50 64 0 .439 87. Arkansas St. 42 54 1 .438 88. Utah 44 57 0 .436 89. Ohio 45 60 4 .431 90. Memphis 43 59 7 .427 91. New Mexico St. 46 62 1 .427 92. Tulane 46 63 4 .425 93. Cent. Michigan 43 60 4 .421 94. SW Louisiana 40 56 4 .420 95. Kent State 38 54 4 .417 96. Rice 44 63 5 .415 97. Bowling Green 44 62 0 .415 98. W. Michigan 41 58 1 .415 99. Pacific 35 51 1 .408 100. Toledo 34 51 4 .404 101. Louisiana Tech 40 60 2 .402 102. Baylor 43 68 3 .391 103. Akron 36 58 4 .388 104. N. Illinois 36 59 2 .381 105. Tulsa 38 63 1 .377 106. Nevada 30 50 1 .377 107. Army 26 53 0 .329 The WWW site wishes to thank the following for the upload. -- Chris Bellomy Official Bait Taster cbellomy@dale.hsc.unt.edu rec.sport.football.college "I don't want to achieve immortality by making the Hall of Fame. I want to achieve immortality by not dying." -- Casey